Dave,
Thanks a bunch for pointing out the untyped code! I have a few questions
below, mostly trying to understand the behavior of the macros and reconcile it
with their names.
I'm not sure that I understand for/foldl and friends. I think of the functions
foldl (and foldr) as taking *one* accumulator, and filtering it through a
function applied to each of the members of a sequence or sequences---that is,
there are many function arguments, but only one accumulator. But, the foldl
here looks like
(define-syntax (for/foldl stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
((for/foldl accums (for-clause ...) body ...)
(syntax/loc stx
(call-with-values
(lambda ()
(for/fold accums (for-clause ...) body ...))
(lambda args (car args)))))))
That is, it has many accumulators, but returns only the first. (I tried
defining the code you linked to at the REPL, and it barfed on some of the
...'s, so I wasn't able to test this assertion. I'm sure that I'm just missing
some libraries.) Am I confused? This sounds more like for/fold/head, or
for/fold/first, or something like that?
I'm similarly a bit unhappy with the name for for/filter. The filter procedure
takes a predicate, and removes any items from its list argument that don't
satisfy the predicate. The for/filter macro is like a (hypothetical)
for/lists, followed by a removal of the false elements. Is there possible a
better name for this? How often do you find yourself using the multi-valued
version (i.e. could we have a single-valued for/not-false or something, that
gets most of the use cases)?
I like for/append without reservation, and have added it to my local iteration
branch, and I'll forward it to Sam once I've built the code and it passes some
tests. Thanks again for suggesting these forms, Dave.
Will
On Aug 24, 2010, at 2:55 AM, Dave Gurnell wrote:
> I use these guys all the time:
>
> http://github.com/untyped/unlib/blob/master/for.ss
>
> No guarantees that I'm not duplicating other peoples' efforts.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Dave
>
> On 22 Aug 2010, at 07:26, Noel Welsh wrote:
>
>> Hi Will,
>>
>> My "numerics" package on Github has for/vector with some slight
>> extensions to yours. I think it also has more error checking so you
>> might want to look at it. I also have for/fold/vector and some
>> sequence abstractions. The code is all parameterised at expansion time
>> by the vector representation.
>>
>> http://github.com/noelwelsh/numeric
>>
>> N.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Will M. Farr <wmf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I've been thinking for a while about putting together a PLaneT library of
>>> some iteration/comprehension forms that I often use that are not found in
>>> the racket core. Right now, I have a small it-comp.plt local PLaneT
>>> package that contains
>>>
>>> for/vector
>>> for/flvector
>>> in-flvector
>>>
>>> The for/... forms have the option of having a first expression that gives
>>> the length of the resulting object (similar to srfi-42's
>>> vector-of-length-ec form) to allow generating more efficient code:
>>>
>>> (for/vector ((x (in-range 3))) x) => (vector 0 1 2)
>>> (for/vector 3 ((x (in-range 3))) x) => (vector 0 1 2) ; but more efficiently
>>>
>>> I'll be adding more forms from time to time, as I need them. Eventually,
>>> I'll release this to PLaneT, but I thought I might ask the community two
>>> questions first:
>>>
>>> 1. Am I duplicating the functionality of some library? (If so, I'll just
>>> contribute to that instead.)
>>> 2. Do you have any iteration "favorites" that I should include in the
>>> library? (Code welcome, but I'm also happy to implement suggestions
>>> myself.)
>>>
>>> Alternately, if you guys want to add these to the core, I'd be happy to
>>> contribute code and tests....
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Will
>>> _________________________________________________
>>> For list-related administrative tasks:
>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
>>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> For list-related administrative tasks:
>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
>
> _________________________________________________
> For list-related administrative tasks:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
