There is not now but we could make a module that only exported them so you could provide all-from-out it and thus centralize the list of subforms. That's the cleanest idea I have. (You don't want to hear my really bad ideas)
Jay Sent from my iPhone On Aug 24, 2010, at 8:46 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <s...@cs.brown.edu> wrote: > Is there a way to say "give me all the require sub-forms" instead of > having to enumerate them explicitly: > > (provide require only-in except-in prefix-in rename-in combine-in > only-meta-in for-syntax for-template for-label for-meta) > > thereby missing some in future extensions of the base language? > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
