On Aug 26, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote: > I know Guillaume proposed to do it in the context of the editor. I'm > unconvinced that that's the right way to go. At any rate, integrating > into an existing bit of infrastructure (def'ns or inter's) is going to > be much more complex than an "off-line" prototype that people can > critique. So we should do that regardless. > > You and Kathy raise good and interesting points. This tells me that > there is not yet a good answer to *where* the stepper should run. I > believe this is quite separable from *how* the stepper runs, ie, how > it displays the sequence of expressions. Since I feel that is > currently the biggest problem with it, it seems wise that we focus on > the latter for now. Once we make some real progress on that > high-order bit, we can see what percolates up. > > Do others agree that this is the high-order bit? If not (and perhaps > even if so), can you articulate why?
I do agree. Your original message seemed to be entirely focused on the *where* question, which I think is why it's what we've all been discussing. John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
