On 8/29/10 8:33 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:32 PM, David Van Horn<dvanh...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:On 8/29/10 8:27 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:What do you propose for/first should return if the set s is empty?#f?Which will do what in a 2-valued context?
Blow up I suppose. I don't care; I'm not going to use for/first with an empty set.
David _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
