The search command got changed a little while ago, I think. :) But I think you should got from 1/n to n/n. (The text search is a little more complex because you can be before or after the first / last hit.)
Robby On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:34 PM, John Clements <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: > > On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:56 AM, mlsm...@cs.vassar.edu wrote: > >> A new problem report is waiting at >> http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view&pr=11166 >> >> Reported by Marc Smith for release: 5.0.1 >> >> *** Description: >> When stepping through a program in BSL, the stepper shows current progress, >> e.g., >> 0/3, 1/3, 2/3 >> But since the step numbers start at 0, the progress only goes to (n-1)/n, >> and not n/n when the user has stepped through the entire program. >> I didn't notice this situation, but my students did during class, which >> became their first lesson in 0-based indexing (for better or worse). >> Thanks! Marc > > That was a deliberate choice, though I could be convinced that it was the > wrong one; I think I was trying to mirror the behavior of the current > "search" command. > > Any other opinions? > > John > > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
