I'm not the right guy to comment on the details of your paper, but specifying the bytecode format is a big win IMO -- it opens up a lot of room for experimentation on the runtime. This is the flipside of multiple language support. Often it is the runtime characteristics that are of as much interest as the langauge (I'm looking at you, Erlang).
N. On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > Hi folks: Casey, Matthew, and I have just sent out a paper to HOSC > about the racket machine. I know there are a bunch of people working > on things at that level, so if you have a chance to take a look at > this, you might find it useful as you muck about down there (there are > examples and things :). Do let us know if you spot any typos too, as > we still have some time to fix small stuff. > > http://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/racket-machine/ > > Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
