On Sep 28, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:

> Can we please not have this??  The whole point of having uniform names
> is that you can use require/provide things easily so there's no need
> for a library.

Sure, I don't feel strongly about it.  Done.

To be clear, my use case is this: I'm trying to debug a seg fault in a large 
library, with >500 uses of 'unsafe-' operators.  I want to see whether using 
the corresponding safe variants eliminates the crash.  The global search and 
replace is a bit of a pain; replacing racket/unsafe/ops with 
racket/unsafe/safe-ops is much easier.

Naturally, though, you can always roll your own as needed.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

  For list-related administrative tasks:

Reply via email to