Four minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> Okay. I'm kind of glad that I came up with the normal thing.
>
> I'll put it on my infinitely long list of TODO items to come back
> and extend the ctypes so that they can specify both aspects of their
> size.
The problem is not in the ctypes, it is in the (lack of) libffi
support for creating types with arbitrary size and alignment. There
might be some way of doing that now. (At least it's a little more
documented than what it had in the past. (= Nothing.))
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
