It would be the same as =, ie, numeric equality. It's not meant to be some sort of generalized equality checker. It's just that we teach our students that predicates end in ?, and that's true of symbol=?, string=?, but not =.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Everett Morse <[email protected]> wrote: > Would this mean "equal?", "eq?", "=", or what? I suppose it would make > sense to be "=?" since the others have a question mark, but I'd almost > prefer it to be "equal?" just to save me some typing. (In fact, maybe I'll > bind it to that myself ...). I imagine that this kind of confusion is, or > is related to, the reason. > > -Everett > > On 09/06/2010 11:31 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote: >> >> Is there a reason =? isn't bound? I see (in Guillaume's logs) >> students actually getting errors because they tried to use it. >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >> > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
