At Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:35:54 +0200, "Jos Koot" wrote: > We already have begin-with-definitions. Would there be a great penalty to > simply wrap every body-like sequence of expressions and definitions with > begin-with-definitions? The latter even allows more freedom than (let () def > ... expr ...), for it allows (begin-with-definitions def-or-expr ...).
In 5.0.1, we changed `let' (and internal definitions in general) to allow `(let () def-or-expr ...)'. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
