I like the change, but I object to late changes in releases. The build script may be an okay exception. My net opinion is no opinion.
Jay On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > Does anyone have a preference or an objection to use this change in > the release? > > * The important bit here is the sh installers for unix -- they're > currently using `plt' and `mz'. (There were some complaints about > this.) > > * It's easy to verify -- just run the generated installers. (And look > inside the source tgz/zip files.) Even if there are problems, > fixing them is just repackaging the installers, keeping the same > contents. > > (Clarification: I don't have an opinion.) > > > A few seconds ago, e...@racket-lang.org wrote: >> >> 2cda694 Eli Barzilay <e...@racket-lang.org> 2010-10-26 07:10 >> : >> | Fix the names used by the `sh', `tgz', and `zip' installers to use >> | `racket', `racket-textual' and `racket-full' instead of `plt', `mz', and >> | `full'. >> | >> | (Also use uniform argument names in packaging functions.) >> : >> M collects/meta/build/build | 108 >> +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > -- Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://teammccarthy.org/jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
