Perhaps the equivalent of that should be a racket commandline flag, to better support .rktl files?
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010, Jon Rafkind <rafk...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > Eli helped me write a module that installs a compile manager which > compiles all loaded files on the fly. > $ cat compile.rkt > #lang racket/base > > (require compiler/cm) > (current-load/use-compiled > (make-compilation-manager-load/use-compiled-handler)) > > $ racket -t compile.rkt -l racket/base -t somefile.rkt > ... > $ ls compiled > somefile_rkt.dep > somefile_rkt.zo > > Any dependancies of 'somefile.rkt' would have been compiled as well. > This is basically the behavior I want so I'm happy. Does anyone want > that module (compile.rkt) in the collects tree (with docs on how to use > it) ? > > On 10/25/2010 07:46 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >> Well, if you're working on things that drracket shares (like the >> quiet.rktl test suite does) then you can't use that. But if you read >> the docs that you were pointed to earlier, you should be in good >> shape. >> >> Robby >> >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Matthias Felleisen >> <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >>> On Oct 25, 2010, at 7:14 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: >>> >>>> IOW, it sounds to me like you want to use drracket with the >>>> auto-compile feature on for all files >>> >>> Amen, which is what I thought when I read Jon's message. >>> >>> Real friends use drracket. -- Matthias >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> For list-related administrative tasks: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >>> >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
