Right, I wanted this experiment to be available to the next person who wonders whether `apply-reduction-relation*' should use a trie. A comment at the relevant place in the code points to the removed commit:
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/blobdiff/152084d5ce6ef49df3ec25c18e40069950146041..f9b64fa2b894ceb0795e4865b6b5f938e9738e81:/collects/redex/private/reduction-semantics.rkt On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe Casey actually wants this code in the history. > > Jay > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 31, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > >> Four minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:32 PM, <clkl...@racket-lang.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> 152084d Casey Klein <clkl...@racket-lang.org> 2010-10-31 17:13 >>>> : >>>> | Adds an experiment in using a trie in `apply-reduction-relation*' >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~ >>>> >>>> f9b64fa Casey Klein <clkl...@racket-lang.org> 2010-10-31 17:28 >>>> : >>>> | Removes `apply-reduction-relation*' trie experiment >>> >>> You should learn about 'git rebase -i', with which you can drop >>> commits entirely. >> >> Actually, in this case a more convenient tool is `git commit --amend' >> which is a way to commit "more stuff" with the previous commit. >> >> -- >> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: >> http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev