Can we make 64bit the default on OS X if it is available in the configure script?
Jay On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > At Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:40:00 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: >> At Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:56:30 -0400, Gene Diveglia wrote: >> > >> > I apologize in advance if I'm jumping the gun a bit here. I'm not sure if >> 64 >> > bit Mac builds are an immediate goal of GR2. >> >> It's a near-term goal, at least. After things are working well on the >> currently supported platforms, I plan to work on 64-bit Mac OS X and >> Windows versions. I don't expect that to take too long. > > 64-bit Mac support was closer to working than I thought. Running the > `racket/gui' test suite turned up only this bug, and it's now fixed. > (The problem was a mismatch between `float' and `double' return types > when getting the value of a scroll bar.) > > So, let's declare that 64-bit Mac OS X is supported for v5.0.99.1 and > later. Please continue to use it and report any other bugs you find. > > > 64-bit Windows support will take longer. Unlike the Cocoa binding, > where I tried 64-bit builds early in the development process, I haven't > yet tried a 64-bit Windows build. > > > In case anyone missed the note on the users lists: Don't try the gr2 > branch anymore. Development has moved to the master branch, and the gr2 > branch is gone. > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > -- Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev