An hour and a half ago, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:06:34PM -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> >
> > Right, this works assuming sane C, and IIRC, with small arrays it
> > can expect the whole array to be on the stack. (But maybe the
> > rules for structs are the same, so it works out by size only.)
>
> C defines that when an array is the actual parameter, the address of
> it is passed instead. [...]
Yeah, sorry, I had things mixed up.
> Of course, some compilers when functions with prototypes are called,
> may do incredibly convoluted things instead to attain greater
> efficiency. FFI would presumably have to match that complexity in
> terms of hardware register hacking.
That shouldn't be a problem for interface functions.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
