On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Noel Welsh <noelwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: >> What's happening here is that the typed wrapper in `typed/rackunit' is >> treating `check-equal?' as a function, but it's really an identifier >> macro that inserts source locations when used in application position. >> This makes it easy to write a typed wrapper, but it has the drawbacks >> you see. Probably the solution is to write a better wrapper in >> `typed/rackunit', but that might be hard without integrating with the >> internals of Rackunit. > > How far along is interop for macros in Typed Racket? Would I have to > maintain typed and untyped version of Rackunit to do things > 'properly'.
The right thing to do for `check-equal?' etc is to have versions that take a syntax object to use as the source location, and then TR could use them. I think that in general it's good to provide such versions for macros where the source location is important to support expanding into those macros. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
