On 28 November 2010 00:31, YC <yinso.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I agree with Neil that xexpr or sxml are very nice representations of html > as well. Given their inherent advantage I think an extensible response > mechanism might work better: > > 1. create hooks to handle different response types > 2. let the different package to install the necessary hooks > > For example - the hook might be called make-response-hook, and in xml > package (maybe xml/web-server.ss) can install the hook. >
> Such a hook will allow others to make their own extension as well to manage > their own custom response types. > Agree! that way the Racket web server seems be able to be widely proliferated, and I can handily make a call to that extension instead of converting back and forth . For example, right now, I have to first convert a list to json object, then to byte string before sending out.
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
