Sounds like DrRacket should delete the .zo file (from its cache, at least) in that case. I've pushed a change that does that. Do let me know if you see problems now.
Thanks, Robby On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Carl Eastlund <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah ha, I have figured out the problem. I had the .zo file, but *not* > the original .rkt file, so there was nothing for DrRacket to > recompile. Sorry for the false alarm! > > Carl Eastlund > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Robby Findler > <[email protected]> wrote: >> That shouldn't happen, since that is a file created by DrRacket for >> its own compilation thingy and when those are created either they are >> ignored or they are brought up to date. I don't suppose you can make >> this happen on command? >> >> Robby >> >> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Carl Eastlund <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Er, sorry, I also had a local module called "rackunit.rkt", the error >>> message was probably referring to that rather than the rackunit >>> collection. Regardless, I am still wondering whether the compiler is >>> supposed to raise an error or simply recompile the file. >>> >>> Carl Eastlund >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Carl Eastlund <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> DrRacket 5.0.2 gave me this error in a program using rackunit: >>>> >>>> compiled/drracket/errortrace/rackunit_rkt.zo:1:0: read (compiled): >>>> code compiled for version 5.0.1, not 5.0.2 >>>> >>>> Is this a bug or a "feature"? >>>> >>>> Carl Eastlund > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
