Won't that make .racket be owned by root again when some preference file gets written out during 'make install'?
On 01/03/2011 12:47 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > Ah. So the problem was that root owned the .racket directory itself. > > Should I revert my commit? > > Robby > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Jon Rafkind <rafk...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> On 01/03/2011 10:52 AM, Robby Findler wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >>>> At Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:39:28 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: >>>>> I've changed the handin server so it puts its docs in the main tree >>>>> like (I believe) it is supposed to. >>>> That breaks the distribution build. The "handin-server" docs were >>>> intentionally not installed into the main tree, because "handin-server" >>>> is not included in the distribution. >>> So what the irc person was doing is just not supposed to work, I guess? >>> >>> I'd still like to find out what preference was getting set, so if Jon >>> tries again, that'd be interesting to me. >> As of commit >> >> commit e6d45e2ae6804a73c9cea2a41d544c4a65b7a5d9 >> Author: Robby Findler <ro...@racket-lang.org> >> Date: Mon Jan 3 08:19:51 2011 -0600 >> >> a 'sudo make install' does not create the ~/.racket directory and things >> install fine into /usr/local when --prefix=/usr/local is given to >> `configure' >> _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev