OUCH! I had accidentally done just that (trying to move it w/o deleting the first instance).
-- Matthias, very old. On Jan 6, 2011, at 7:32 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > I think it was the four question marks in the subject that made me > reply like that :) > > Robby > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: >> >> I guess I am so old that you should assume I don't know that much :-) >> >> >> On Jan 6, 2011, at 7:10 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >> >>> I think it means something like this happened: >>> >>>> (new (class object% >>> (super-new) >>> (super-new))) >>> . . collects\racket\private\class-internal.rkt:4455:0: instantiate: >>> superclass already initialized by class initialization for class: >>> unsaved-editor2155:3:7 >>>> >>> >>> but I don't know how you're making admin% do that. >>> >>> Robby >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am getting this: >>>> >>>> . . instantiate: superclass already initialized by class initialization >>>> for class: admin% >>>> >>>> >>>> 1. There is a single new expression in the buffer >>>> >>>> 2. There is no superclassing >>>> >>>> Any hints before I try to create a bug report? >>>> _________________________________________________ >>>> For list-related administrative tasks: >>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >>>> >> >> _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev