At Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:20:51 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote: > So instead of changing the 510 back to 400, I think that I'll remove > it completely, and make the packing code not include any version > requirements at all, and make the unpacking code not check any version > requirements from older versions. > > Matthew: does this sound reasonable?
It's difficult to tell, but that sounds plausible. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
