I don't feel strongly about this and you seem to, so supposing we support any conflicting installations, it makes sense for Planet 2.0 to have both major and minor versions.
Jay 2011/2/19 Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu>: > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> It looks to me like you there is relevant, important metadata that >> you're making someone fold into an implicit place instead of an >> explicit one. >> >> Will you have a convention for these? What if I decide to call mine >> "libgtk2.0" and someone else calls theirs "somepackage-2"? That >> doesn't seem good fo > > [ Sorry; got distracted here and forgot to come back. ] > > That doesn't seem good for users who are trying to find packages. > Especially if I were to call mine "2-somepackage" (you may think this > far fetched, but if you look you should find an example of this in our > current collection tree....) > > Robby > -- Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
