About a minute ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> For people wanting to make it easy for their PLaneT packages to be
> incorporated into Racket core... should we be using LGPL 2.1, or
> some other license?
>
> (I've been using LGPL 3 for most things lately, but I don't mind
> going back to 2.1 if that's where Racket wants to be right now.)
To avoid such problems as recontacting people if/when the Racket
license version changes, I simply used
Distributed under the same terms as Racket
(This includes your file, BTW, at "collects/2htdp/private/csv/csv.rkt")
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
