The rackunit foldts seems test-suite specific so perhaps it should be called foldts-test-suite (similar to fold-test-results).
Robby On Monday, March 7, 2011, Noel Welsh <noelwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe it should be in another library, then. foldts is an important > part of Rackunit's current API, though 1) nobody has ever used it > AFAIK, and 2) this might change in the near future. > > N. > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:20 PM, John Clements > <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: >> Currently, 'foldts' is provided by rackunit. Not surprisingly, the sxml >> stuff also provides foldts. I'd rather just have one copy--especially >> because 'except-in' requires seem to sometimes incur large performance >> penalties--but I'm not really sure where that "right place" is. Honestly, I >> don't really think it belongs in rackunit, but I'm willing to be overruled. >> >> Can we do one of these? >> 1) not provide it from rackunit, >> 2) not provide it from rackunit and put it somewhere else, or >> 3) tell me that I'm wrong, and I'll just add a dependency from my sxml >> package to rackunit? >> >> John >> >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >> > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
