Well, the error message's phrasology pleasibility quotient is so high; how can you not be overlovingly enjoytasitic?!
Robby On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > In my joy over contracts for override and pubment I completely totally > misread the error message (I saw define-values instead of default-value). > > > > > On Apr 7, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > >> On 04/07/2011 08:31 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >>> >>> Matthew& Ryan (mostly): >>> >>> I wrote >>> >>> (inner (send bag full?)) >>> >>> instead of >>> >>> (inner (send bag full?) rerack!-enabled?) >>> >>> and got this error message: >>> >>> inner: expected an identifier after the keyword and default-value >>> expression in: (inner (send bag full?)) >>> >>> Looks like the macro expansion 'bled' through. Can we use syntax-parse to >>> fix this? >> >> I don't know what you mean by the macro expansion bleeding through. What >> error message would you like to see? >> >> Ryan > > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
