At Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:43:57 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote: > we're losing pretty hard on deriv.
It looks like 20% of the time can be saved by JIT-inlining the `procedure-arity-includes?' check that `map' performs. (And I've been meaning to make that JIT change anyway, since it's an obstacle to using `map' in futures.) I'll push a change soon. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
