I think I'm asking the wrong question. I should instead ask: What does the man page for fpsetmask() say should be #included?
(The switch to #include <ieeefp.h> was based on a FreeBSD man page.) At Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:01:11 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:07:28 -0600, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > Looks like it should really be > > > > #ifdef FREEBSD_CONTROL_387 > > #include <ieeefp.h> > > #endif > > > > Does that work on your machine? > > It works with the additional patch > > From a8be877b89891a0c19a99b37a6218057e04f5456 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: David Bremner <brem...@debian.org> > Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:00:37 -0300 > Subject: [PATCH] Add cdefs.h and param.h before ieeefp.h. Change ieeefp.h to > machine/ieeefp.h > > --- > src/racket/src/number.c | 4 +++- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/racket/src/number.c b/src/racket/src/number.c > index fea2871..1dc38e5 100644 > --- a/src/racket/src/number.c > +++ b/src/racket/src/number.c > @@ -187,7 +187,9 @@ READ_ONLY Scheme_Object *scheme_single_inf_object, > *scheme_single_minus_inf_obje > > > #ifdef FREEBSD_CONTROL_387 > -# include <ieeefp.h> > +# include <sys/cdefs.h> > +# include <sys/param.h> > +# include <machine/ieeefp.h> > #endif > #ifdef LINUX_CONTROL_387 > # include <fpu_control.h> > -- > 1.7.4.4 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
