On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > 2. Could you point me to a criteria that classify Racket as a 'fringe' > language > and Clojure as a non-fringe language?
This is no criterion, but it is suggestive: http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=5&q=racket%20-%20tennis%2Cclojure&date=1%2F2008%2040m&cmpt=q But to be fair, popularity is a terrible metric: http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=porn%2Cfood%2Cwater&cmpt=q This page shows the relative popularity of `DrScheme' to `Racket'. https://sites.google.com/site/evalapply/name-change It appears that `Racket' has only recently overtaken `DrScheme' in what people search for. -- ~jrm _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
