15 minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think it's a bad idea to extend the SRFI modules with new functions.
>
> Would it make sense to move functionality from SRFI-19 into
> `racket/date' and then add the new functions there (and maybe change
> the SRFI-19 implementation to re-export part of `racket/date')?
+1, if possible -- maybe it will also solve the license issues with
that file?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
