At Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:21:18 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > In any case, I do take compatibility as a priority, so I'm suggesting > allowing both orders for this case.
You also mentioned disallowing improper lists as a related change, which could be significant. I'd much rather leave this alone and spend time elsewhere. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
