Me too. I like `take-until' as well. 2011/6/8 Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com>: > I'd really like #:unless as well > > iPhoneから送信 > > On 2011/06/08, at 9:21, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > >> Anyone seconds this? >> >> And if so, then maybe for-loops should have an `#:unless' too? (I >> know that this was raised, but now there's more experience using it.) >> >> >> >> Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote: >>> I've used them before and I find they "read" better than using negate. >>> >>> 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org>: >>>> Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' >>>> versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? >> >> -- >> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: >> http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >
-- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev