We're talking about relative requires only, right? How are you proposing to signal the error?
Robby On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:37 PM, John Clements wrote: > >> I'm fixing require in the stepper, and I want to make sure that the existing >> behavior is desirable before I try to simulate it. In particular, my >> experiments suggest that "require" in an unsaved buffer implicitly requires >> things from (current-directory). Is this the right behavior? It would seem >> to me that we'd be better off signaling an error in this case. No? > > Yes, please signal an error. > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
