An hour and a half ago, John Clements wrote:
> In certain places, I know that we're trying to be careful to
> minimize 'require's that occur as part of DrRacket startup. Is
> 'rackunit' something we're trying to avoid? Specifically, I have old
> unit tests in collects/stepper/private/shared.rkt that I'd like to
> revive as rackunit tests.
Adding this is a bad idea -- but size is not the problem -- the
redundant dependency is.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
