On Jul 6, 2011, at 7:06 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > 15 minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote: >> >> Below is very opinion-heavy seat-of-pants reaction. I'm not >> familiar with Ohloh, and I could be off the mark... >> >> The Ohloh site seems oriented towards PHBs who use 'analysis' like >> "decreasing year-over-year development activity" without wondering >> whether it's at all accurate and meaningful. > > They're pretty good, I think, about showing the caveats. For example, > in the code history (and project cost etc) there is a comment that > says that often they see only part of the history, which you can see > with an initial spike of code.
FWIW, the nice thing they had to say about the project was: --Large, active development team-- Over the past twelve months, 37 developers contributed new code to Racket. This is one of the largest open-source teams in the world, and is in the top 2% of all project teams on Ohloh. For this measurement, Ohloh considered only recent changes to the code. Over the entire history of the project, 52 developers have contributed. John Clements
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
