On Jul 9, 2011, at 5:38 PM, Clark Grubb wrote: > This seems to be a bug. Here is the > Racket behavior and Haskell behavior > for comparison.
I believe what you're actually observing here is a difference in the order in which arguments are presented to the given function. E.G., try "cons". John > > ====================== > > $ racket > Welcome to Racket v5.1.1. >> (foldl - 0 '(1 2 3)) > 2 >> (foldr - 0 '(1 2 3)) > 2 > > ====================== > > $ ghci > GHCi, version 6.10.4: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help > Prelude> foldl (-) 0 [1,2,3] > -6 > Prelude> foldr (-) 0 [1,2,3] > 2 > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
