Precisely. On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Stephen Bloch <sbl...@adelphi.edu> wrote: > > On Jul 11, 2011, at 6:32 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > I'd much prefer eliminating such function calls. > > What harm do they do? You can't call any library function with the wrong > number of arguments, and you can't define a zero-argument function. The > only way this affects a BSL student is if the student is using a library > that provides a zero-argument function, which it presumably does because the > library author thinks BSL students NEED a zero-argument function. > I wouldn't draw attention to the existence of zero-argument functions in the > docs, but I don't see that we need to overrule the judgment of every library > author who ever provides one. > Stephen Bloch > sbl...@adelphi.edu > > > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
