Two minutes ago, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> On 2011-08-06 8:25 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > *However*, there's an awful lot of functions to try -- going over
> > them will make a very slow search...
>
> There's not *that* many. How long does 100,000 function calls take?
Not much, but:
* Just loading the code will take some significant time.
* Some calls will inevitably need to be rejected on the basis of a
timeout. (For example, imagine (sleep 10).) If there are many of
these, things become slow again.
(Oh, and BTW, gui functionality will be interesting too.)
> I'd imagine you'd search the exports from racket/base before looking
> further afield, as well.
If you restrict the search for only these, then things are definitely
much more practical.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
