I would prefer not to get an error so that I can compile modules independently.
On Aug 17, 2011, at 5:58 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > Is there a subtle reason to not error? I've just seeded a file with a > lot of @tech{} uses and I was hoping to get a big list of errors as a > to-define list. > > I looked at the code and found a commented-out error printing in the > HTML renderer. I think it would be great to re-enable it, perhaps with > a command line flag for the original objector? > > What's the scoop? > > Jay > > -- > Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> > Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University > http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay > > "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev