Three hours ago, Robby Findler wrote: > > I'm not seeing anything when looking at your code that looks > suspicious, but I'm not sure of the ins and outs of the sandbox > protocols so I'm not sure who to blame here (well, probably the > sandbox needs to be blamed since the error is not illuminating, but > there may be other problems that that error is masking). > > One difference that I notice is that scribble's make-base-eval doesn't > create the evaluator in the same way your code does; it uses a > different argument to make-evaluator that puts the evaluator into a > different mode somehow. That could be relevant. > > Maybe Eli can say more?
I have no idea what the problem is, or how to get it without involving planet. One thing that might help: remove the `sandbox-error-output' parameter which can swallow some other error. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev