50 minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> The `begin-for-syntax' form in v5.1.3.7 supports variable and macro
> definitions within a module for all phases N >= 0 (finally!).
!!!
Does this mean that `define-for-syntax' becomes as deprecated as
`require-for-syntax' etc, right?
Also, does `provide' work fine in a `begin-for-syntax'?
Assuming that it is, it could have been nice to have it called just
`for-syntax', since
(for-syntax (require foo))
becomes equivalent to
(require (for-syntax foo))
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
