On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > I'm not familiar with CPANTS, but automating real-world feedback something > like that sounds useful. > > I think you should be conscientious about the tiny "phoning back to the > mothership with more info" privacy problem, and how best to manage that, even > if it's just real disclosure (not "privacy policy" smallprint). I can't > think of anyone else in the US who is right now, but I think that information > privacy should always be a consideration in automated community-sourcing > problems.
Sigh... I respectfully disagree. I feel that in some ways, this argument eight years ago prevented us from gathering a whole bunch of information that could have been quite useful to us. It depends on whether you see Racket as a bulwark against a rising tide of invasive internet presence, or as the potential beneficiary of social media tools. John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
