On 09/27/2011 07:54 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:39 PM,<ry...@racket-lang.org> wrote:
ryanc has updated `master' from 247a51d5bd to c7f86d276c.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/247a51d5bd..c7f86d276c
=====[ 5 Commits ]======================================================
The commit log says "removed useless requires" but this is one of the diffs:
collects/framework/gui-utils.rkt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--- OLD/collects/framework/gui-utils.rkt
+++ NEW/collects/framework/gui-utils.rkt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-#lang at-exp scheme/base
+#lang at-exp racket/base
-(require string-constants scheme/gui/base
- scheme/contract scheme/class)
+(require string-constants racket/gui/base
+ racket/contract/base racket/class)
(require scribble/srcdoc)
(require/doc scheme/base scribble/manual)
and there don't seem to be any useless requires removed.
More precisely, that commit removes some useless requires and replaces
some imports with more specific modules (or sets of modules), such as,
replacing scheme/contract with racket/contract/base.
And there were a few other changes, such as changing a few uses of block
to let when the final form was always an expression.
But more interestingly, scheme/base and racket/base are not identical,
right? I think the struct binding is different. And maybe other
things? Did you make sure that these differences don't matter in all
those files?
The check-requires script, which suggested most of these changes, will
not recommend replacing scheme/base with racket/base if the module
actually uses any of the scheme/base-specific bindings (eg,
make-base-namespace).
That's not to say the script is always perfect, but it's pretty smart.
And the major dangers are renamings and side-effectful modules, most of
which are rare enough for me to handle them by hand.
Ryan
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
