There are ways around it like that. For example, I'm trying to get in the habit of using ~.s in printf's where it might occur. But, I think it would be easy in this case to just fix the real problem.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > 10 minutes ago, Doug Williams wrote: > > Maybe this is general question or observation, but I specifically > > have the problem with the xml module in Racket. All of the > > structures defined in collects/xml/private/structures.rkt are > > transparent. Most of my xml files are hundreds of thousands of bytes > > to tens of megabytes in size. Needless to say, if any of these make > > it to a display statement, it isn't pretty. Actually, since the > > structures also include location information, the result can be (is) > > larger than the actual XML was. > > If this is printout on the repl then maybe `pretty-print-depth' is the > right answer? > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
