On 10/05/2011 02:07 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Looks like I spoke too quickly. I think I'm actually not going to be
much help with this.
In particular, I don't know what mix does and I can't figure out from
the docs, so I don't know what it means to replace 'mix' with 'list'.
I can try again if you want, but maybe it is easier for you if you
just do it. If not, I'm happy to help with whatever tasks you think
I'd be useful for.
The old 'plot' and 'plot3d' took a procedure with the contract
(some-drawing-area -> void?), which was meant to draw the plot. The
'mix' function composes them.
I'm not asking you to try again. It's more efficient for everyone if I
do the porting page anyway. Besides, adding a porting page will allow me
to solve some minor organizational problems in the docs as they are.
Thanks for wanting to help with that.
I thought of a task you'd "be useful for". If it's not too much trouble,
could you compile your papers with the plots in them and see what breaks?
Neil T
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
