Sam wrote:
Unlike, say, `syntax-parse', `match' isn't designed for the use-case of building ASTs while matching.
Wait, what? That's exactly what I want to use it for when writing toy interpreters for pedagogical purposes. Or am I misunderstanding what you're saying here? I want to do PLAI-style things, but with `match' instead of `type-case'. --PR
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
