May I propose a compile-time interaction window in drracket? -- Matthias
On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > Well, when you do IO at compile time there isn't really a good place > to put it (at least not at the moment) so instead of making a good > place to put it, I just let it go to drracket's stdout. Probably > reasonable to consider this a bug. > > Robby > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Matthias Felleisen > <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> >> Yeap, I have live CS running all the time. Interesting effect. >> >> >> On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >> >>> Probably when you were running check syntax? (Or maybe when it was >>> being run for you?) >>> >>> Robby >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Matthias Felleisen >>> <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am running the silly program below (no meaning), and on occasion I see >>>> the output of the *** line in the console from where I launched drracket. >>>> 5.2.0.1 from 10/16 >>>> >>>> >>>> #lang racket >>>> >>>> (require (for-syntax syntax/parse)) >>>> >>>> (define-for-syntax (postfix stx word stem) >>>> (datum->syntax stx (string->symbol (string-append word "-" >>>> (symbol->string stem))))) >>>> >>>> (define-syntax (define-un-serialize stx) >>>> (syntax-parse stx >>>> [(_ name:id (argument:id ...) unparser:expr parser:expr) >>>> (define serialize (postfix stx "serialize" (syntax-e #'name))) >>>> (define deserialize (postfix stx "deserialize" (syntax-e #'name))) >>>> (displayln `(,serialize ,deserialize)) ;; **** >>>> #`(define-values (#,serialize #,deserialize) >>>> (values (lambda (argument ...) unparser) >>>> (lambda (msg) parser)))])) >>>> >>>> (define-un-serialize f (x y) values values) >>>> _________________________________________________ >>>> For list-related administrative tasks: >>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >>>> >> >> _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
