On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> Robby privately wrote to say it should be regarded as a bug. > > That is the correct behavior for `racket': [...]
Just in case this was not clear from my other messages, I still consider this a bug (not in #lang racket). Our customers (like Shriram in this case) expect things to behave in a consistent way and we should support them in that. IMO. Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
