On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Jon Rafkind <rafk...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > I guess runtime stack traces won't help. It would be nice to see all the > locations the syntax went through in its lifetime. Maybe it could be stored > as a syntax property?
You mean you could, say, click on some subexpression in step N and then go back one step and find that expression (if it still exists) in the previous step in the stepper? Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
