Mine are from the pre-r6rs days are exactly the same definitions as from the GSL, which may differ slightly from those in r6rs. I would have to check. They already exist in Racket in the r6rs stuff. I have no problem with using those definitions instead of the ones from the GSL.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Ryan Culpepper <r...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > On 11/18/2011 12:13 PM, Neil Toronto wrote: > >> I've moved this to dev from a private discussion with Doug, who has just >> tried the nightly build. >> >> On 11/18/2011 11:43 AM, Williams, Doug wrote: >> >>> 2) The plot/utils has nan? and infinite?, which are also exported from >>> the science collection and I had to explicitly exclude them in the >>> require. Can we talk to the powers that be and see about getting them >>> (and finite?) moved to racket/math? Then we can both remove them from >>> our code. [I'm not sure about any interaction with the r6rs functions.] >>> >> >> Powers That Be, Doug and I would like `nan?' and `infinite?' to be in >> `racket/math'. >> >> I made an exact equivalent of Doug's `finite?', but called it >> `regular-real?'. I use it in all kinds of function contracts (it returns >> #f for non-reals). We would also like that one, with either name, in >> `racket/math'. >> > > How does 'finite?' differ from 'rational?'? > > If we're making a wishlist, I'd really like '{positive,nonnegative}-{real, > **rational}?'. > > Ryan > > ______________________________**___________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/**listinfo/dev<http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev> >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev