I thought about that too since there are few instances where people pattern match on the URL struct. What would be a good name for the new field... url-maybe-query?
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Robby Findler <[email protected] > wrote: > I don't think we want to change how the current url struct selectors > work when applied to url structs. > > You could probably get away with changing the url struct if you could > provide functions that act the way the old selectors used to work -- > does that help? > > Robby > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > jay has updated `master' from 6a99c93ebb to 9d8d36e568. > > http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/6a99c93ebb..9d8d36e568 > > > > > > > 7f9818b Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> 2011-11-23 10:35 > > : > > | This fixes 10497 and potentially breaks programs that assume the query > of a URL is always a list. I have fixed uses in the Web Server, which I > expect is the major thing affected, but much more could be. Therefore I am > skeptical this is a good idea just for the representation of ?. So, I'd > like other people to review the change and let me know if they think I > should revert it. > > : >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
